May Meeting Notes – A Wider Field of Vision

Bruce Milne gave a wonderful presentation at our May 13th meeting. It included a showing of some of his ‘PhotoScapes’ as well as a very unusual camera. His talk included some of the history of panoramic photography and how its earliest use was to record historic events (civil war photos, etc…). Most fascinating was the astonishing detail in George Lawrence’s photos of the aftermath of the San Francisco earthquake!

Bruce also explained the nodal point of a lens. (If you don’t know what that is, click here for more info). He also spoke of using Photomerge in Adobe CS4 and setting his camera completely to manual while shooting his panoramas.Bruce Milne snake hollow underpass

While showing some of his very large prints he explained that he strives to capture the feeling of being in a space. “I find nature to be very intimate,” he said. His website goes into greater detail and I recommend taking a look. 

An excerpt: Landscape: the Intimacy of Space

“As a child growing up in rural New York State, I spent my time exploring and
adventuring in the woods, fields, and streams which surrounded me. I found mystery in
abandoned buildings and other artifacts of past lives. Nature in all her shapes, sounds,
smells filled my senses. These experiences were for me profoundly intimate: the smell of
decay; of thick black mud sucking at my shoes; reverberation of footfall and forest
creature echoing through the cathedral canopy; the constantly shifting depth of field;
rusted objects forsaken or lost, their purpose long forgotten or obsolete. In this immersion
I would find myself surrounded, comforted, engrossed in a true intimacy of space.

In this current body of photographic work, I attempt to capture and convey that sense of
intimacy, of inclusion that I experience in the field, whether woodland, meadow,
waterway or structure. The shapes become iconic, the spaces transportive, not in
abstraction, but in their essence.”

Click here to visit Bruce Milne’s website

Of related interest: DPreview has an interesting article about iPhone Panoramas: Editorial: Why I can’t stop taking iPhone Panoramas

November 2011 Meeting Notes

Hello All,

We had a very good meeting yesterday, and a lot was accomplished.

Nine people brought in work in response to the assignment which was to make an abstract photo, as an exercise in sharpening one’s visual sense, and exploring those elements of a photograph that exist outside the presentation of realistic content. This proved to be a bit more difficult than one had imagined.

A lively discussion ensued, and Frank Roccanova introduced a novel concept to distinguish between two types of abstract photos:

1. Good
2. No good.

Frank went on to explain that it seemed to him that “good” abstract photos where those in which one could not identify the objects in the photo, while No Good abstracts were those where the elements could be easily identified. This astute observation served to underline the power of photographs to portray reality and the difficulty of making “good” abstracts by Franks definition.

None the less, there were many “good” ones, here are just a few examples.
rock by Bob Tepe and abstract by Dainis

Most of the photos were close ups of well known objects, which were removed from the normal context which would have made the elements of the photo easier to identify.

However, Bruce Milne showed a photo that took the opposite approach. His shot was a telephoto of an icy river landscape that covered several hundred yards: the abstract quallity came from the fact that the elements were so small that they could not be recognized.

Bruce Milne, icy river photo

Jökull patterns by Bruce Milne

Everyone agreed that this was a very useful exercise, and so it was decided to continue this assignment for the January meeting.

It would be great if those who have not yet shot an abstract will do so, and those who have already done so successfully will also make a new contribution, perhaps further inspired by the evening’s discussion and presentations. The important thing in this exercise is to create the abstract quality while taking the picture, and not in Photoshop, as it is really an exercise in “seeing”.

– Jonathan Morse