February 2012 Meeting Notes

The February meeting explored the age old problem of representing ever moving time with but a single still image. The meeting was very well attended, and six members presented work for the review.

Dainis presented a number of different techniques, and I found this multiple exposure to be the most effective.
american flag - dainis
Everyone is familiar with flags waving in the wind. As the wind increases, the gentle waving turns into a manic flapping. Back in the day, multiple exposures were an all too common error with manually operated cameras. Now a days, it is almost impossible to even make a multiple exposure with an electronic camera, and the effect must be created in after capture in Photoshop. This picture seems to create the impression of a flag beating in a strong wind more effectively than either a stop action or a motion blur, does it not?

Marilyn presented a variety of ways to indicate action, but I found this series of a butterfly drawing nectar from a flower to be the most instructive.
butterfly

This close up stop action shot is wonderfully revealing of detail on a beautiful flower and butterfly, showing a marvelous pattern that might not be seen at all by the naked eye.

On the other hand, is not this blurred shot more illustrative of a live butterfly as it darts and flits from flower to flower in nature? Has anyone discarded this kind of photo with barely a glance, perhaps prematurely?
butterfly2
Bridg presented several interesting ways of showing time. One was a stop action video that compressed a year of construction into a few minutes of video in a way that was more illustrative of the job than either a still shot or a conventional video.

He also showed what can happen when everything is just right in a high speed shot. The most dramatic moment in the launching of a ship is when it leaves the ways and splashes into the usually still harbor waters with a tremendous splash. This strong diagonal composition, and perfect timing capture the moment perfectly, showing a moment in time with more impact than a fleeting frame in a moving image.Ship splash
Yvette used an entirely different technique to define a moment: soft focus.vows by yvette

By eliminating all normal “photographic” detail from this photograph, the more significant body language comes to the fore, making this image more painterly, and this special moment more memorable.

 

Perfect stillness is harder to portray than may be imagined. We use the expression “still life” to describe a scene that has been consciously composed to allow a careful portrayal, either by painter or photographer.

But when shooting natural scenes, the there is a difference between simply showing a scene with no movement in it, and the indication of that perfect, quiet, stillness that so rarely occurs.Still pondPerfectly flat water, water as flat as a mirror, actually occurs in nature rather infrequently. In this shot that perfectly calm water may
promote the sense memory of a particularly silent moment on a still and chilly autumnal morning.

THE ASSIGNMENT:

Back in the day, photography was entirely a black and white affair. From it’s earliest days in the 1830’s until the wide use of Kodachrome after World War II, there was very little color in photography, and none at all available to the general public.

From the 1950’s to the seventies, the 35mm color slide was the standard way of taking color pictures, until the ubiquitous one hour photo lab brought wallet size color prints to the masses.

But it was not until the rise of digital photography and the Epson inkjet printer that amateurs and professionals alike were able to make their own color prints at a reasonable cost in their own studios.

The result was that color, glorious color, became the linqua franca of virtually every photographer, as “free” digital “film” and inexpensive inkjet printers allowed everyman to own a “digital color darkroom”.

Or did it, really?

The classic black and white photographs certainly did not lose their appeal and many photographers continued to work entirely or partially in black and white, producing strong and memorable images.

(Some of the best black and white photography can be seen in Hollywood movies from the golden era, and stills from the period by such masters as Karsh, Hurrell and Bull,)

For our next assignment we are going to study the effect and impact of color and black and white on contemporary photography.

Members are requested to bring in images taken in both color and black and white, to illustrate and explore which technique is more appropriate, and when.

As always, kindly bring your work in a thumb drive, trying to make the images as 8×10 .jpgs at 72dpi. If anyone is unsure how to do this exactly, please ask, and we will give a quick demonstration. There’s really nothing to it.

– Jonathan Morse

January 2012 Meeting Notes

The January meeting was very well attended, and seven members brought in work in response to the assignment which was to make an abstract photograph.

Rob Reardon showed some very compelling abstracts which he took on a dull winters day in a boat yard. As anyone who has ever visited a yard in winter knows, there just isn’t a more depressing place, but Rob was able to find some wonderful compositions, and prove once again that one needn’t wander far from home to make great pictures. These shots certainly met the criteria of “good” abstracts: they are fascinating images and not even experienced boatyard cranks in the group could tell what the subject matter was.

Boat yard abstract photos by Rob Reardon

Boat yard abstract photos by Rob Reardon

Dainis showed an ultra closeup of a scallop shell many thought was a man made structure, some sort of corrigated siding, although they should have guessed it was a scallop, considering Dainis fondness for shooting sea shells.Marilyn Stevenson showed some “light paintings” that were not really abstractions of a real object, as the objects portrayed only existed as traces in her camera. If the word “photography” means drawing with light, then these were the purest of photographs.

Marilyn Stevenson 'light painting'

Marilyn Stevenson ‘light painting’

Loretta Bechert showed a number of shots that used motion to create an abstraction, and in so doing, anticipated the theme that we will consider next: the matter of time itself.

passing taxi & train

Loretta’s passing taxi and LIRR train

Meryl Spiegel showed some pictures from her phantom series in which time and the ethereal nature of existence also played a major role. Even though the picture itself was not an abstract, the central figure of the scene was, lending a sense of mystery and unease to the picture.Joan Santos submitted two abstracts which were on the cusp of the “good” -”no good” spectrum, as some members could immediately identify the subject, while others could not.The title, “shades” was a big hint.Determined to prove that one needn’t travel very far to find an image, I shot some abstracts of my footstool with my iPhone, without even moving from my desk chair, whilst moving the phone as fast as I could. With totally automatic devices, it is really a challange to get a completely abstract photo.

Two abstract photos of foot stool and one non-abstract rendering with feet shown.

Thanks to everyone who presented work for this assignement.

The assignment for February is an examination of the influence of the element of
time itself in photography.
– Jonathan Morse

November 2011 Meeting Notes

Hello All,

We had a very good meeting yesterday, and a lot was accomplished.

Nine people brought in work in response to the assignment which was to make an abstract photo, as an exercise in sharpening one’s visual sense, and exploring those elements of a photograph that exist outside the presentation of realistic content. This proved to be a bit more difficult than one had imagined.

A lively discussion ensued, and Frank Roccanova introduced a novel concept to distinguish between two types of abstract photos:

1. Good
2. No good.

Frank went on to explain that it seemed to him that “good” abstract photos where those in which one could not identify the objects in the photo, while No Good abstracts were those where the elements could be easily identified. This astute observation served to underline the power of photographs to portray reality and the difficulty of making “good” abstracts by Franks definition.

None the less, there were many “good” ones, here are just a few examples.
rock by Bob Tepe and abstract by Dainis

Most of the photos were close ups of well known objects, which were removed from the normal context which would have made the elements of the photo easier to identify.

However, Bruce Milne showed a photo that took the opposite approach. His shot was a telephoto of an icy river landscape that covered several hundred yards: the abstract quallity came from the fact that the elements were so small that they could not be recognized.

Bruce Milne, icy river photo

Jökull patterns by Bruce Milne

Everyone agreed that this was a very useful exercise, and so it was decided to continue this assignment for the January meeting.

It would be great if those who have not yet shot an abstract will do so, and those who have already done so successfully will also make a new contribution, perhaps further inspired by the evening’s discussion and presentations. The important thing in this exercise is to create the abstract quality while taking the picture, and not in Photoshop, as it is really an exercise in “seeing”.

– Jonathan Morse